'Critical Analysis of the Conflict Theory Essay\r'

' at that place argon three major theories: geomorphologic Functionalism, Symbolic Interaction, and contravention. These theories relate to the main aspects of flavour in a accessible club: organized group membership, interaction, and impinge. break of wholly three of these, contest seems to be the nearly straight-for warfared. Every person has experienced infringe in life. The main focus of this guess is how force bodily structures and world-beater disparities impact deal’s lives (The Catholic University of the States, 2008). bout guess according to Crossman (2013) emphasizes the role of coercion and function in producing sociable order. This is derived from the utilizations of Karl Marx, who saw club as fragmented into groups that repugn for neighborly and scotch resources.\r\n check to Walsh (2012), Karl Marx (1818 †1883) is the father of critical criminology; he is in addition associated with the ideas of sociableism and communism. â€Å"Th e core of Marxism is the concept of assort jumble: Freeman and slave, patrician and plebian, lord and serf, guildmaster and journeyman, in a word, oppressor and oppressed, stood in constant opposition to one a nonher. The oppressors in Marx’s time were the owners of the means of production (the bourgeoisie), and the oppressed were the workers (the proletariat). The bourgeoisie strives to keep the cost of cut into at a minimum, scarce the proletariat strives to sell its labor at the highest possible price. These opposing goals atomic number 18 the major source of booking in a capitalist hostel. The bourgeoisie enjoys the upper hand be courting capitalist societies defend large armies of unemployed workers eager to secure work at nearly(prenominal) price, thus driving brush up the cost of labor. These economic and complaisant arrangements †the material conditions of people’s lives †determine what they will know, believe, and value, and how they w ill be render.” To summa germinate this up, Marx referred to these groups as the have’s (bourgeoisie), and the have not’s (proletariat).\r\nRead Also: Critical sentiment Essay Topics\r\nConflict theory is in center arena a complex brass with imbalance, which leave behinds in skirmish that puke leave to kind change. It explains social life through sagacity social processes as the expiry of the constant struggle amidst groups. In society there are limited resources, such as power, wealth, education, and prestige, as a result people make do for those resources for survival and to improve their position in society. As stated by McQueeney (2011) according to difference theory, society is: â€Å"A struggle for dominance among competing social groups (classes, genders, races, religions, etc.). When impinge theorists look at society, they see the social mastery of mortify groups through the power, authority, and coercion of dominant groups. In the contra vention view, the most powerful members of dominant groups throw the rules for success and opportunity in society, much denying subordinate groups such success and opportunities; this ensures that the powerful continue to monopolise power, privilege, and authority. You should note that most passage of arms theorists oppose this flesh of coercion and favor a more able social order. Some support a nail socioeconomic revolution to socialism (Marx), while others are more reformists, or perhaps do not see either social inequalities stemming from the capitalist body (they believe we could solve racial, gender, and class divergence without number to socialism).\r\nHowever, many an(prenominal) conflict theorists focus on capitalist economy as the source of social inequalities.” The primary cause of social problems is the exploitation and oppression of subordinate groups by dominants. Conflict theorists generally view oppression and inequality as wrong, whereas geomorpholo gical-functionalist may see it as unavoidable for the smooth running and integration of society (McQueeney, 2011). As noted by the New universe of discourse encyclopaedia (2013), conflict theory attempts to refute the functionalist approach, which considers that societies and organizations function so that each individual and group plays a specialized role, like organs in the body. on that point are radical basic assumptions (society is eternally in conflict, which might explain social change), or moderate ones (custom and conflict are always mixed). The core group of conflict theory is best epitomized by the classic â€Å"pyramid structure” in which an elite dictates terms to the larger masses. all told major social structures, laws, and traditions in the society are designed to support those who have traditionally been in power, or the groups that are perceived to be victor in the society according to this theory (New military man Encyclopedia, 2013).\r\nConflict t heory presupposes the chase according to Ritzer (2007): conflict or struggle between individuals and groups who have opposing interesting or who are competing for scarce resources is the middle of social life; disputation and conflict materialize over many types of resources in many settings, alone power and economic resources are the principal sources of conflict and competition; conflict and struggle typically result in some(a) individuals and groups dominating and controlling others, and patterns of subordination and subordination tend to be self-perpetuating; dominate social groups have a disproportionate influence on the allocation of resources and on the structure of society. Ritzer (2007) mentions that in conflict; class struggle is the most fundamental and underlies all other forms. Political, ethnic, religious, and ideological conflicts not only limpid the predominant form of class conflict and the character of the dominant class, but also in essence would not exist at all were class conflict to be eradicated. As stated by Mooney, Knox, &type A; Schacht, (2007), the conflict perspective explains various aspects of our social world by looking at which groups have power and benefit from a fact social arrangement.\r\nFor example, feminist theory argues that we live in a patriarchal society †a hierarchical system of organization controlled by men. Although there are many varieties of feminist theory, most would hold that feminism â€Å"demands that animated economic, political, and social structures be change” (Mooney et al., 2007). The Russian gyration of 1917 atomic number 50 be seen as an outcome of the conflict theory. This even illustrates the major revolutionary power of the rise of one social group against another. As indicated by the New World Encyclopedia (2013), the conflict theory can be applied on twain the macro level (like the United States government or Soviet Russia, historically) or the micro level (a perform orga nization or school club). Conflict theory seeks to catalog the ways in which those in power seek to stay in power. Conflict can arise in different areas: law, religion, education, or media, and can be found in the powerful defend their monopoly, or the powerless attempting to change the status quo. There are some dress applications according to The Catholic University of America (2008) that the conflict theory could be use: it informs policy and may guide to a macro-level practice; it could be useful in formulating assessments involving oppression and knob exposure; and could enhance understanding of conflict between persons, ideas, groups, classes, and larger social structures.\r\nPractice interventions could be audition for evidence of oppression within individuals, groups, and communities; paying assist to the role of conflict leading to client vulnerability; organizing to alter power relationships; and recognizing that dominant and subordinate groups compete for resources (The Catholic University of America, 2008). When it comes to conflict the assumption is that if you have interaction, because you automatically have conflict. There is no gentle society that could exist without possessing conflicts of interest; conflict is shape and necessary for growth and social change. In understanding conflict theory, the New World Encyclopedia (2013) states that competition between social classes plays a key part. The following are four primary assumptions of modern conflict theory: firstly, competition over scarce resources (money, leisure, internal partners, and so on) is at the heart of all social relationships. Competition rather than consensus is characteristic of human relationships. If everyone could tug what they wanted, then there would not be any conflict. Secondly, inequalities in power and reward are reinforced into all social structures. Individuals and groups that benefit from any particular structure strive to see it maintained.\r\nThirdly, change occurs as a result of conflict between social class’s competing interests rather than through adaptation. It is often abrupt and revolutionary rather than evolutionary. Lastly, even war is a unifier of the societies involved, as well as war may set an end to whole societies. There are many assumptions regarding the conflict theory. In summary, conflict theory is the exploitation of the lower class by the wealthy, the unfair relationship between the worker/ tenant and the landlord/boss, and the idea that money will always communicate about conflict. It is an interesting way to look at the world. Conflict theory may seem straightforward, but it isn’t always so cut and dry. In order to understand society, this Marxist theory must(prenominal) be considered without forgetting about other forms of conflict theory. According to The Catholic University of America, 2008, the conflict theory gives us some human behavior concepts such as: all societies perpetuate some fo rms of oppression and injustice and structural inequity; power is unequally divided and some groups dominate others; social order is based on manipulation and control by dominate groups; social change is driven by conflict, with periods of change interrupting periods of stability; and life is characterized by conflict not consensus. Conflict is an endemic; the goal is to manage conflict so it does not escalate to damaging levels.\r\nReferences\r\nThe Catholic University of America (2008, August). Overview of theories of human behavior and the social environment. Retrieved July 25, 2013, from http://ncsss.cua.edu/res/docs/field/theories.pdf Crossman, A. (2013). Conflict Theory. Retrieved July 24, 2013, from http://sociology.about.com/od/Sociological-Theory/a/Conflict-Theory.htm McQueeney, K. (2011). Conflict Theory. Retrieved from\r\nwww.unc.edu/~kbm/SOCI10Spring2004/Conflict_Theory.doc‎\r\nMooney, L. A., Knox, D., & Schacht, C. (2007). Understanding social problems (5th e d.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.\r\nNew World Encyclopedia (2013, June 13). Conflict theory. Retrieved July 25, 2013, from http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Conflict_theory\r\nRitzer, G. (2007). Conflict Theory. In The Blackwell encyclopedia of sociology (Vol. 2, pp. 662 †665). Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub.\r\nWalsh, A. (2012). Critical theories: Marxist, conflict, and feminist. In Criminology: The essentials (pp. 93-110). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.\r\n'