College Athletes Should Be Paid Essay -- Argumentative Persuasive Athl

College athletics is a billion dollar industry and has been for a long time. Due to the increasing ratings of college athletics, this figure go out continue to rise. Its simple bigger, faster, stronger suspensors will gene say to a greater extent m nonpargonily. College Universities generate so such(prenominal) revenue during the year that it is alto watchher fair to the interpreters that they come out a cut. College athletes should get remunerative based on the universitys revenue, app bel sales, and lack of disbursal money. I believe that college sports should be considered a profession. Athletes deserve to be nonrecreational for their work. College athletics are a critical part of Americas culture and economy. At the present time, learner-athletes are considered amateurs. College is a stepping-stone to the professional leagues. The NCAA is exploiting the student- athlete. Big-time schools are running a national entertainment business that controls the compensation rate of the players like a monopoly (Byers 1). According to the NCAA regulations an athlete will lose his/her eligibility if they are paid to play sign a contract with an agent throw a salary, incentive paymentment, award, gratuity educational expenses or allowances or play on a professional team. The word amateur in sports has stood for unconditional values compared to professional, which has had just the opposite. The professional sport has meant bad and degrading plot of land the amateur sport has meant good and elevating. William Geoghegan, Flyer News sports editor writes, Would gainful athletes tarnish the ideal of amateurism? Maybe, but being fair is far more important than upholding an ideal (Geoghehan 1).Some people say that college athletes get paid by having a scholarship, but if you look at it a antithetical way, scholarships might change your mind. Coaches try to get players who they think have the gift to make them win and to persuade them to come to their school by offer them scholarships. The whole idea behind a scholarship is to lure the athlete into coming to your school. Scholarships are nothing more than a recruitment tactic. They will give you a scholarship as long as you flummox for them. Its all about what you can do for them. Indeed these scholarships pay for tuition, room and board, and books, but these athletes dont have money for different necessities. The NCAA doesnt want friends or athletic supporters to offer athletes jobs because they ... ...hletes recruited to attend college come from lower, childbed families. The opportunity to enter the draft early to help their families financially is one that will hardly be passed by.On the issue of college athletes getting paid, I believe they should. When I mean getting paid I only mean a stipend or weekly check, not thousands or millions. All the hard work and dedication they put into their sport and academics are worthy enough. I have had a chance to play collegial sports and it t akes a lot out of you mentally and physically. The student athletes deserve at least enough money to have a normal student life. $300-$400 a month should give athletes enough money to get the required necessities. All this does is replace the notion of the athlete getting a job for a source of income. This will also help rationalize the rate at which athletes accept money, cars, and gifts from boosters. When athletes get caught accepting something from a booster it looks bad on the athlete and the college. So, in my opinion yes college athletes should get paid, there is too much money that the universities have earned floating roughly going unanswered for the athletes not to get their cut.