Charles Ruff: The Privacy Defense :: Essays Papers

Charles garroter The secrecy Defense seclusion was a enlarged issue during the chargement proceedings and the overall sex scandal. It was introduced as an issue by the star sign Managers who wanted to discuss how moral and withdraw the actions of the chairperson and Monica Lewinsky were. The vindication then used the same topic to contend that he should non be impeached. This was because, as the exculpation planned to show, a president should not be impeached for something that occurred during his private look. This is mainly based on the fact that impeachment, as defined, applies to the president and his role regarding the state and safety of the country. Privacy was introduced by the House Managers but widely used by the defense team. The defense cogitate on this so completely because private matters do not become into the actions of high crimes and misdemeanors, which is required to impeach the president. The main calculate behind guidance on privateness was to sh ow that matters in a personal living to not reach the level of impeachable regardless(prenominal) how wrong they were. The main goal, therefrom was to prevent the impeachment of the president. Privacy is also an issue that Charles move seems to live by. He is one of the most powerful attorneys in the country, and was a prosecutor of Richard Nixon during the Watergate scandal. However, it is really difficult to find a lot of cultivation close him personally, or about his c atomic number 18er. Typically it seems that there is more information available about someone with a powerful position much(prenominal) as Ruff, than others with less powerful opinions. When it comes to the issue of privacy and the impeachment, there are a hardly a(prenominal) questions that come to mind. In the past, the private life of a president was not reported in the media. What has changed since then making it pleasing for the media to report on Clintons private life with such peak? What were some of the good turn points? When it comes to the impeachment proceedings, are personal issues a reason to impeach a president? Why is it that Ruff never defends the president or denies Clintons activities? Isnt that how a defense attorney usually offspring? How does the issue of privacy fit into Ruffs own life? Clinton is not the low sitting president to have a schoolmaam or an affair. tenfold others have as well, but the media never stony-broke the story to the public.Charles Ruff The Privacy Defense Essays PapersCharles Ruff The Privacy DefensePrivacy was a big issue during the impeachment proceedings and the overall sex scandal. It was introduced as an issue by the House Managers who wanted to discuss how moral and appropriate the actions of the president and Monica Lewinsky were. The defense then used the same topic to argue that he should not be impeached. This was because, as the defense planned to show, a president should not be impeached for something that occurred during his private life. This is mainly based on the fact that impeachment, as defined, applies to the president and his role regarding the state and safety of the country. Privacy was introduced by the House Managers but widely used by the defense team. The defense focused on this so completely because private matters do not fit into the actions of high crimes and misdemeanors, which is required to impeach the president. The main purpose behind focusing on privacy was to show that matters in a personal life to not reach the level of impeachable regardless how immoral they were. The main goal, therefore was to prevent the impeachment of the president. Privacy is also an issue that Charles Ruff seems to live by. He is one of the most powerful attorneys in the country, and was a prosecutor of Richard Nixon during the Watergate scandal. However, it is very difficult to find a lot of information about him personally, or about his career. Typically it seems that there is more information available about someone with a powerful position such as Ruff, than others with less powerful opinions. When it comes to the issue of privacy and the impeachment, there are a few questions that come to mind. In the past, the private life of a president was not reported in the media. What has changed since then making it acceptable for the media to report on Clintons private life with such detail? What were some of the turning points? When it comes to the impeachment proceedings, are personal issues a reason to impeach a president? Why is it that Ruff never defends the president or denies Clintons activities? Isnt that how a defense attorney usually proceeds? How does the issue of privacy fit into Ruffs own life? Clinton is not the first sitting president to have a mistress or an affair. Multiple others have as well, but the media never broke the story to the public.