South Korea: A Poorly Developed National Innovation System and a Leading Role in the Semiconductor Industry

A. to the south KOREA?S topic foundation garment SYSTEM (NIS)1I. stinting OVERVIEW11.Economic growth history12.Major scotch indicators2II. to the south KOREA?S CATCH-UP INNOVATION MODEL21.Chaebol42.Government53.University7III.MAJOR WEAKNESSES OF SOUTH KOREA?S NIS81.Limitation of catch-up model92.Deficit engineering science difference of payment93.Inefficient form _or_ placement of government formulation104.Chaebols? roles to be reconsidered105.Heavy trustingness on hostile supplies106.Imbalanced parsimoniousness of R&type A;D resources and outputs117.Poor interactions among GRIs, universities and private sector118.Shortage of basic research139.Inadequacy and aristocratic quality of R&D manpower14IV.FUTURE VISION OF SOUTH KOREA?S NIS15B.SOUTH KOREA?S semiconducting material INDUSTRY16I.OVERVIEW OF ACHIEVEMENTS IN THE SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY16II.SOUTH KOREA?S SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY IN INTERACTION WITH DRIVING FORCES171.From 1965 to 1983182.From 1983 to now19III.CASE muse OF SOME SOUTH KOREA?S SEMICONDUCTOR COMPANIES21C.CONCLUSION24BIBLIOGRAPHY25. A. SOUTH KOREA?S NATIONAL INNOVATION SYSTEMI. ECONOMIC OVERVIEW1. Economic Development HistorySouth Korea?s innovation advancement is certainly an integral part of its history, particularly the post-war time. Science and engineering policies alter in each stage, globe both the reason and event for economic performance and priorities.

guide to World Bank?s study in 1993, Korean development history is shared out into 5 chief(prenominal) time periods:? War, reconstruction and kickoffer reform (1950-60)? Export mockery (1961-73)? Heavy and chemical industries knife thrust (1973-79)? Functional incentives and relaxation way (1980-90)? Financial sector liberalization (1990-now)Export farce periodThe export takeoff period was characterized by the predatory promotion of exports combined with untainted import protection at home by utilize trade, foreign exchange and fiscal policies. The trade regime was slanted in favor of exports. applied science was mostly acquired from abroad. Despite the event that FDI policy in this period was rather free, foreign coronation in South Korea remained very(prenominal) low due to uncertainties about the region?s policy-making and economic outlook. Therefore, FDI did not act as a main delight for technology transfer. This mission rest in policies of foreign licensing, gift priority to technology that promoted exports, positive intermediate products for big(p) goods industries or brought dispersal effect to other sectors. The inhibitory policy on licensing built local... If you want to get a honorable essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper