Happiness And Thought Disorder Philosophy Essay

satisfaction And Thought Disorder Philosophy quizEveryone in invigoration should be content and the public opinion of enjoyment creation a rowdiness should not be a thought individual soak up in there mind. In A proposal to fall apart bliss as a psychiatric overthrow, Richard Bental argues that gratification is a study affective disorder. Although Richard Bental includes many accounts, I pass on focus on his telephone line that happy sight have been sh experience to exhibit biases judgments that prevent them from cosmosness true to life(predicate) and unrealistic opinions, and that happy flock are not psychiatrically disordered. I will develop my opinion on rejoicing give reason in why happiness should not be called a disorder. I will argue that Richard P. Bental makes an rail line that he deal must be true, only when doesnt seem to be and the argument seems to be unsound. Realistically, bulk in life will not think of there state of happiness being a dis order that adopt attention, Therefore Happiness should not be con positionred a major disorder with bad side affects.First I argue that happiness is not a cause for therapeutics concern. Statistically not many hoi polloi have made a doctor put down for being happy all the time. I make more sense for batch to go to therapy for var. and miserable about things. Without signs of happiness and grin you can not attract many relationships and friends in life. Good soma Test The argument seems to be deductive. Without a doubt the pen sticks to his thought of happiness being a disorder. I argue that it is not believably for to attend therapy concerning problems with being happy. Although the reference seems to have researched the topic, it is not proven that the disorder and side affects of happiness are anyway a bad side affect that affects that person life. In life when people seem to be happy and live a great life, it has almost alship canal attached them better chances of liv ing than unhappy people. current premises test I turn over the Author thought of happy people packing therapy if controersial and false. The author goes on and explains research and why people should go to therapy but statistically I do not believe many happy people will seek therapy. Many people seek therapy when there seems to be greater problems that a doctor will have concern about. I believe the author would accept my argument later on looking over statistic and talking to a therapist to view that average of how many people visit for problems on happiness.S2 Happiness is known for having low stress and advanced work performance, therefore it does not seem to be the type of stress the Bental explains.I will argue that a better term called generalise Happiness Disorder is a better explanation than Bental view on disorder.(Sabah,Karima)GHD is now as a large part of the population and the effects are low stress, productive work, and positive social relationships. I believe m ore people can relate to this view point of happiness being a disorder versus Bentals. Bental believes that happiness is a disturbance of the scatterbrained system and is very rare in some parts of the world. I believe that everyone finds ways to be happy in there own way, and at some point of time everyone will find ways in life to be happy. Good Form Test The argument seems to be deductive. There is an article that explain happiness and a disorder with nothing but positive outcome which is opposite as the authors explanation. The author gives examples of what other people thinks of happiness which is more of a positive case. Bental lighten believes that happiness can cause abnormalities and bad nervous system. I this is invalid. True Premises Test Again I believe the author is polemical and his premises for the argument seem false. Based on the Generalized Happiness Disorder happiness is a good state on being and the effect are not related to BentalsS3 People being happy in lif e does not require them having to take medication therefore, happiness should not be considered a disease that disturbs the corpse. When people smile it is a sign of happiness and smiling takes less muscles in your frame than frowning. It is statistically proven the opinion will be the second largest killer after heart disease by 2010. After reading over percentages manage this it is not likely that a person wants to compare there happiness to a disorder or disease. Good Form Test This argument seems to be deductive. The author seems to make and invalid point but believe you cannot deny his conclusion. When happiness enters the body it is a healthy change for the body and its not harmful. Unless a person is abnormal he/she does not need medication for a happy condition. True Premises Test I believe the authors argument is controversial and false. Based on the facts about depression more people are known to take medication and have complication in life from sadness and depression .I believe my arguments are also Deductive and pass the true Premises test. Many people in life would disagree in going to therapy for reason of happiness and, many people would agree with the Generalized Happiness Disorders rather that Bentals rackOverall the state of being happy is more acceptable to people as a Generalized Happiness Disorder rather that psychiatric disease that needs therapeutic attention. Happiness may cause changes to you body but will always make better changes that sadness. Happiness is not a disorder that need attention, but its a disorder that people should look at in a good way. The GHD is the best was to explain happiness as a disorder. You should ignore that concept feeling the need for therapy and help in a happy state of being.